Law Firm Planner - Legal News - Amazon Hit With Class Action Over Zappos Data Breach
Law Firm News
Today's Date: Bookmark This Website
Amazon Hit With Class Action Over Zappos Data Breach
Topics | 2012/01/18 10:05
Shoe retailer Zappos is facing a national class action suit one day after it warned customers that its servers had been hacked.

On Monday, the Amazon-owned shoe company sent a mass email stating that 24 million customer accounts had been breached. The incident resulted in hackers obtaining names, phone numbers, emails, encrypted passwords and the last four numbers of customer credit cards.

The lawsuit claims Amazon violated a part of the Fair Credit Reporting Act by failing to properly encrypt and secure customer information, and seeks unspecified damages for 24 million customers.

The lead plaintiff in the case is a Texas woman but the suit was filed in federal court in Louisville, Kentucky on the grounds that Amazon has servers located in that state.

As these type of hacking incidents have become more common, so too have related lawsuits. So far, though, few of these lawsuits been successful because customers have been unable to show that they have been harmed by the data breaches.

The Kentucky lawsuit appears based in part on a novel legal theory that customers will now be more susceptible to phishing and other online scams because hackers have their email. It also alleges the plaintiffs suffered emotional distress. Other high-profile data breach cases such as one involving Sony’s Play Station have been based in part on state consumer laws.

Although courts have been reluctant to find that customers have been harmed by data breaches, there is evidence this may be changing. A security publication recently reported
that an appeals court allowed customers to claim they suffered harm in the form of having to buy insurance for identity theft.

Some media publications this week praised Zappos’ for having a pre-arranged plan to respond to the data theft. The company claims that its customer credit cards remained secure because they were stored in a separate server.

[PREV] [1] ..[1010][1011][1012][1013][1014][1015][1016][1017][1018].. [2020] [NEXT]
Law Firm News
Headline News
Law Center
Court Watch
Legal Interview
Lawyer News
Legal Focuses
Firm News
Supreme Court rejects anti-a..
Michigan Democrats back Ness..
Court: Man can't be retried ..
Question of sales tax on onl..
Clicking 'checkout' could co..
Zuckerberg Flubs Details of ..
Facebook to stop spending ag..
Singer Cliff Richard's case ..
Russian court blocks popular..
Court: Teen accused in schoo..
North Carolina court allows ..
Retailers hope for certainty..
Ohio court to decide if ex-p..
Court to decide if drug use ..
Lawyer tells Australian cour..

   Lawyer & Law Firm List
St. Louis Missouri Criminal Defense Lawyer
St. Charles DUI Attorney
Chicago Truck Drivers Lawyer
Chicago Workers' Comp Attorneys
New York Adoption Lawyers
New York Foster Care Lawyers
Adoption Pre-Certification
New Rochelle Oil and Gas Industry Law Firm
Canton Family Lawyer
Canton Divorce Lawyer
Philadelphia Employment Lawyer
Attorney Marc E. Weinstein
© Law Firm Planner. All rights reserved. - Legal News and Articles on Recent US Legal Developments.

The content contained on the web site has been prepared by Law Firm Planner Media as a service to the internet community and is not intended to constitute legal advice or a substitute for consultation with a licensed legal professional in a particular case or circumstance. Legal Blog postings and hosted comments are available for general educational purposes only and should not be used to assess a specific legal situation. Law Firm Website Design by Best Lawyer Website Design- Attorney Web Design That Works